This Is Madness, or: Julie’s Outline Process of DOOM

I’m currently preparing to write my third novel, and as I go I find myself marveling at the madness of the process.

I don’t know what it looks like when other writers set out to develop a book idea or draft an initial outline, but for me it’s a bit like watching a star form out of Chaos. First two random hunks of rock hurtling through space and time and life collide (Idea!) and then there’s this magnetic pull: slight at first, and then strong, stronger, and finally berserk. The gravity that’s been ignited is the initial idea drawing other pieces, fragments of the story to it. The pieces fly to one another and fuse, arranging and building on themselves with unstoppable electric energy, and the gravity of the gathering mass increases until the particles whooshing toward it fly so fast they could shatter bones. And then, when the parts have gathered and shaped themselves and the dust has settled, there it is: Your Story.

Or rather: Outline #1.

That’s right. Everything I’ve just described– the forming of a microcosm unto itself–

Yep, “Eyjafjallajökull,” about accurately describes it–

is what I see happen whenever I go about planning a book.

To understand me, one has merely to refer to one of the sprawling documents that is my starting outline. I sometimes save these documents as “Book Title – Master doc,” but “master” could not be a balder misnomer. The first outline is sheer madness.

What Julie’s initial outline for a book looks like:

It starts with a single detail or a vague idea. A few main events follow. Perhaps a series of details I think I’ll need to refer back to: the phases and dates of an MC’s rotating art class, the items she has with her when she stumbles into another world. After that a numbered list; a collection of sentences that begin with the word “maybe”; a handful of homeless puzzle pieces.

And then, oh, I don’t know, a 74-itemed working list of all the story’s events in haphazard chronological order? But only if said list is replete with dozens of sub letters, highlighted sentences, half-written passages and dialogues, snippets of text turned blue or pink or green or in brackets. And ah– let’s not forget times and dates, where applicable.

After that disorientation, another two pages of questions, backstory, orphaned details and yet more sentences that begin with “maybe” should follow. Insert bullet list for good measure.

Finally, after a few nonsensical equations (Cat = Lulu) and at least one BIG REVEAL!, a portion of text near the end which is bolded and then promptly forgotten.

Then: When all this is achieved, work should be done exclusively from the document’s middle.

This is an approximation of what past and present starting outlines have looked like for me. Like I said, chaos.

And yet somehow, out of this mindstorm of confusion and debris and disorder within disorder, a story is born. It might take a few drafts– hell, it might take a few outlines– but eventually that initial groundwork translates into a single, coherent, easily-read and satisfying novel.

Your Book.

If that’s not a human miracle, I don’t know what is.


8 responses to “This Is Madness, or: Julie’s Outline Process of DOOM”

  1. Reassuring that your process looks so chaotic. It’s not just me!

    1. Haha. The relief is mutual!

  2. My process is just as chaotic. Plus I start writing scenes here and there without knowing if they’ll contribute to the whole novel!

    1. OMG! I do that, too!!! Terribly impractical when you’re trying to make a clean chapter-by-chapter in bullets or numbered items and all of these half-formed scenes keep popping out…

  3. I’m also starting to plan my third book! Except I didn’t really outline the first two, and I’m determined to outline this one, so I don’t have much of a plan on how to do that. I’m in the random notes phase right now.

    1. Whoop whoop! Third book internet five!

      Does that mean you pansted your first two novels? (Or semi-pantsed? Hah!) At any rate I hope your first outline is less chaotic than mine have been 😉

  4. Love your images of confusion and disorder rearranging into a coherent whole. And the poor ‘orphaned detail’ 😦 Sometimes that bit is so good you’ve got to find a place for it, like a child hammering a square shape into a triangle-shaped hole.

    1. At one point I started a “graveyard document” for lines/passages I loved but ended up cutting. Maybe I should do the same thing for details I envisioned, but never found their way into the book!

What’s the word?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: